The Right Of National Dominance

The nature of dominating is entwined in the fabric of existence. The meaning of existence is to do so. Selfishness is an innate characteristic of everything. Atoms steel electrons to maintain or strengthen its atomic structure, erosion is resisted innately and we are of the same equation. Maintaining stability in a complex environment requires an equal amount of resolve. If longevity is desired then more advanced measures are applied to accomplish this motive.
The right for a nation to exist is an illogical question. You have become therefore you are. You’re birthed into existence and now it becomes a matter of maintainace. The notion of rights is inalienable in the construct of birth. The fact that you have become is the concrete reality of being rightsiously parallel to any other entity. Denying ones righteous existence is the selfish pursuit of competing entities. This is a natural consequence of selfishness. It now becomes the reflex of the denied to counter the competitor’s pursuits. If longevity is desired the actions are justified. It is the actions that determine the consequences. The consequences will affect longevity.

Selfishness and Lust

Fredrich Nietzsche talked about reconsidering two core values of life that were pushed back by mainstream religion they were selfishness and lust. These values left unchecked could reek havoc on society was the fear of both Nietzche and religion. Nietzche advocated embracing these values civilly to more closely parallel human nature. Religion chose to suppress these values even though they are the embodiment of those qualities ‘Selfishness and Lust’.

What Is Art?

Art is an expression of human experiences that elevates humanity. Anything less is just an expression. In the definition of the term art, it renders the concept an objective notion.
Art in the eye of the beholder is not the definitive determination of art, although an interpreter is required in the entire equation, the interpreter must adhere to the prime nature of the term. Art is a construct of man for man. A blade of grass is not art. An artistic depiction of that blade is. The wheel is a work of art, creative, progressive and symmetrically beautiful. The wheel indeed is an example of human elevation. A spider spins a symmetrically beautiful seemingly artistic web. This does not elevate a spider existence; this ability is innate in the construct of the spider, as in all web spinning spiders.
Though nearly all men are capable of artistic expression, not all expressions of humanity are elevating. A child molester who arranges a unique mosaic of child pornography into a photo album is not a form of art. One who excretes human waste in the center of a white canvas is not rendering a work of art. These are forms of human expression, not art. Albeit in the eye of the beholder, they do not elevate humanity.
An elaborate pyramid constructed for human sacrifices decorated in creative depictions of these barbaric events, does not qualify this structure as a work of art. The engineering is masterful and it qualifies as human excellence, but the content and of its purpose is abominable to humanity. It’s an expression of humanity, but in its totality it is not a work of art. It is a larger more complex version of the excrement on a white canvas. It is a perversion of art, subjective ness attempting to pervert the purity of an objective nature, art.

The Point of Latino Ownership

Can someone decide to become Latino? Many different cultures have merged with the Latin American region, are they truly considered Latino? The indigenous people have existed in the region for millennia, are they considered Latino? I will clear up any misnomer of who one truly is. No matter what region of the world someone comes from.
Who is worthy to become a representative of the nation one claims as his or her own? Or more importantly is why does someone claim a nation as their own? Simply put it is what you make it. A Nation is a construct of its people. People dwell and toil in the grounds that they make their own. The birth of a community is the result of their sustaining efforts. Together as a community as the people of that region have shared the burdens and the triumphs of years of a self-sustaining cohesion.
Therefore your sense of nationalism is a construct of the individual’s own passion toward community. Thus if you were to relocate your community you would still be a product of that community with all its cultural practices and sense of belonging.
The geographical fixation would be of minor importance. You are the cultural ownership of the region you hold dear to your heart due to the efforts put in by your historical lineage. What you bring and take from that community becomes that product of that community. A geographical land mass is only soil. The human element is what gives it identity. Historically a multitude of cultures have passed through a geographical fixation. The History of that culture is who you are. That is why it is said ‘To know who you are you must understand your history’. An issue with this concept is often people don’t go back far enough.
The concept of Universal Humanity is paramount. This segregational construct of mankind throughout the millennia has resulted in the illusion of incompatibility. Scientifically there is no sub classification of genetic differential of any racial note. We are entirely one species of no genetic deferential. We have divided our selves through our own historical experiences. The concept of a national or global melting pot is innately a correct one. The ownership of a cultural identity is relative to the sincerity of the orators’ historical linage. If you proclaim to be Latino and have historical lineage you are a Latino, regardless of your physical appearance. If you divorce yourself from all ancestral and historical practice of Latino identity, you are no longer a Latino.
You are in charge of your own destiny; you are what you make it.