What Is Conscious of Being?

Consciousness of self and or being, the notion of existing in existence. 

  Logically we are a string of causal events, a complex matrix of particles in an elaborate environment. Because we are aware of our being, what does this really mean or consist of? The how will define the why. Learn how this is and you will know why this is. 

  I submit to you that we are of equilateral phenomenologically 

conscious as the rock, one in the same. We are sensory beings of various complexities. Our sensory ability is of greater range to detect our environment than other entities. The rock for example, the complexity of our state does not subject the complexity of the rock to inferiority. Our causal evolutionary branch is no more valid than that of the rock's evolutionary molecular status. We are equipped with sensory receptors of various attributes, to maintain the elementary outcome to exist. The rocks existence is on equal molecular interaction and behavior. The rock's molecular construction is of its own evolutionary branch of happenstance. The particles of construction interact through the same discipline and natural laws. The subatomic exchange of both of our molecular models is awareness in every sense. The complex sensor exchange of our receptors is constructed  through electrical and chemical exchanges. The complexity of our exchange does not qualify us as superior in evolution. Sub-atomically in a reductionist sense the equality becomes understood. It is only in the macro appearance does the sense of separation distance us in form in the psyche of man. 

  Subjectively the least of substance constitute a lesser value. The value is not in the performance but the end result. Complex sensory is an elaborate performance by means to an end. It is the end that justifies the means. The end equivocates the means of conscious construction. Stone or man has no dominion over being in existence. Both are equal in attendance and of molecular behavior. Consciousness is subjective in application but not in constitution.

The Deconstruction of Yin and Yang

The notion of perfect balance, of symmetrical oppositional dualities. Is there such a reality? Can true perfect balance exists? 

  Existence is of a constant state of change or motion. The exchange or interaction of entities demonstrates an eternal alteration of existence. A perpetual flux of teaming particles transitioning through eternity, where nothing remains the same. Frozen time or space is an illogical notion, a fantastical ideology suggested by the whimsical adventurers. The most modest of contemplation delivers the concept of eternal motion versus the absence of motion. The absence of motion is non existence, an impossible construct. Existence is defined by the state of being. Being, is the presence of an existing construct which implies interaction amongst preexisting properties. Constructs are not birthed into a static motionless environment, therefor being or existing is essentially motion. Motion and non-motion is existence non-existence. 

   Complete and true balance implies a finite completion of a statical construct, a set fixture of adhesion that discounts any further adjustments. Purity in symmetrical placement, and of a set amount of properties with no further amendments. This concept renders the construct inactive or motionless. Because any further action dilutes or corrupts the purity of the construct. Alterations in the construct redefine the state of perfection, implying perfection was never a true state of being, that all states of being are in transition.  

Purity in symmetry and construct is an impossible reality. Not even momentarily can this notion of perfect symmetry exist. A stationary fixture of pure symmetry is in opposition of reality. Reality is constantly forming and motioning to change to comply with new and flowing existence. Fixed templates of perfection are fallacies in an ever changing existence. The birth of any event is sequential. No event enters an environment in parallel equality. One event must follow another. Paired entities implies balance and perfection, this is not the true state of its construct. Parity is only a seemingly event, through closer examination a sequence of events has transpired in relative close actualities. The spiral configuration that is so prominent in our universe is due to the sequential construct of layered phenomenological events. Asymmetrical, this is only achieved by the notion of inequality. The notion of unity is a secondary event, subsequent of a singularity. Imbalance and conflict is the advent of further evolution, advanced evolution will retain conflict in its nature. No advanced form of evolution will be foreign to conflict or strife. 

   The Yin and Yang is impossible and illogical in purity and construct. Asymmetric's are the true state of being and functionality. There is no achievable balance in nature. The yin and yang is a conflict for existence, where both entities are engaged in a struggle to annihilate each other. The duality implies no harmony, conflict is what's transpiring. A struggle that one may prevail over the other. The yin and yang concept as a harmonious symbolism that implies perfection of nature is a total fallacy, an impossible construct that is illogical and misidentified.