There are profound questions about life and purpose to be understood. It becomes a matter of how one asks’ the question. Once the question is raised no matter how direct, the consideration is a subjective one. Some may consider their own lives and the impact they had on others as purposeful. One could find multitude of reasons to substantiate their own everyday existence. I want to examine two of the more profound concepts of Purpose of Life. Why would life begin in the first place, and the meaning of life itself? In pursuing these two questions about life, I have examined the concept that Life and Existence are two completely different entities. Life being completely dependent on Existence for is origin and sustenance, and Existence requiring nothing from Life being completely independent and of its’ own notion. Existence is a notion UN to itself. This truism has profound implications. The notion of Existence always existing bound by no end or beginning, a pure timeless, formless entity. The notion may be a difficult one to fathom, but it is a logical explanation, contrary to the attempt to rationalize the origin of something from nothing. The notion of something before nothing is completely illogical. Something does not dwell in a void of nothingness and spring forth the complexity of existence. A pure void of nothingness advents nothing. On the contrary something can create something. A preliminary environment must exist to advent further events. It’s a requirement to any further evolution.
To understand what purpose life may have you must examine our beginning. The key to these extraordinary concepts is logical progression of Evolution. Evolution defined as the end results of cause and effect. Many challenge the concept of evolution by disection of linear portions of specific chain of events, finding lack of definition as cause to withdraw the entire theory. Evolution as a concept must be comprehended as a totality, not a segmented analysis. To evolve is the current results of cause and effect. You must not examine the extinctions of natural selection and conclude them as failures of natural selection. They are necessities of competition, vital stages of competition that lead to the current results of adaptation. Though certain species are extinct, they have contributed to the current status of existing species. They are apart of the total equation.
For every action there is a reaction. You cannot have a cause without an effect, or vise versa. This is the foundation of events. Then it is our aptitude to retro mind the tale of our origin. Evolution is an action that champions no victors or supports no defeats. You succeed or fail by happenstance. Champions of natural selection are only temporary victories in the long-term examination of events. In time all species die and all constructs deconstruct. The seemingly success of adaptation eventually will run its’ course. No matter how complex or advanced a species is or the strength of inanimate object is, eventually change will render a constant inconstant.
The retro analysis of our existence can be logically understood by chronological reconstruction, and be compared to any universal example. In this retro process the lineage conclusively dilutes to a point were a finite causality emerges. This emergence is the result of pure randomness birth from the chaotic abyss of preexistence. Random patterns and partial assemblies occur then deconstruct till the most opportunistic stable event occurs and survives the turbulent conflict of competition. Many patterns or scenarios may have succeeded eventually or devolved into the perpetual conditions of chaos.
Conflict is entwined in the definition of existence. It is an inseparable characteristic of existence. Without conflict you cannot have evolution. It is conflict which delivers orderliness. The struggle and success of assembly repels disorder. Chaos is in perpetual pursuit of orderliness. Chaos is supreme in purity. Chaos requires nothing but itself to exist. Order requires chaos to parallel its justification. Orderliness must spring from chaos, due to chaos being non-progressional. Chaos needs no motivation to exist. Orderliness requires chaos to motivate and sustain its’ existence. Structure is the abnormality; chaos is a natural state of existence. The erosion of structure is the natural reversion of elemental behavior. This precept is the determinate of Existence and further concrescences thereof.
Why life would need to begin, implies a justification thereof. The need for life is not justified. The causality of life is completely happenstance out of the infinite combinations of probabilities. Life’s existence is endured by its’ own success of stability. This renders life’s origin and end completely purposeless. The persistent state of chaos is nipping away at life’s stability, effecting the life-span of its’ success. The concept of life everlasting becomes a probability not an absolute.
Since life does exist. The true meaning of life is inherent in its’ construct, and that is to live. We are compelled to perpetuate this pointless existence to its’ ultimate potentiality. The opposition to life remains steadily motivated.
